Healthy progress
Varied steps, low loop pressure, no exact-cycle coverage, no live alert.
- event_typeobservation
- tokens2,562
- cost at risk$0.00025951
- chain headcc1e5de803c4
The demo is useful when it produces evidence. These receipts show the CAUM boundary in public: structural telemetry only, hash-chained evidence, no raw content, no semantic truth claim, and no agent blocking.
They show CAUM observing structural differences between clean progress and repeated work. They do not prove semantic truth, realized savings, or future failure prediction.
Varied steps, low loop pressure, no exact-cycle coverage, no live alert.
Repeated state transitions created exact-cycle coverage and live structural loop evidence.
A short retry probe followed by replan progress kept the public signal in observation.
In this evidence packet, the loop receipt has materially higher reviewable exposure than the guarded receipt. This is a unit contrast from controlled receipts, not a guaranteed savings claim.
Cost at risk inside the loop receipt. Exact-cycle coverage is 1.00 and live_alert=true.
Cost at risk inside the guarded receipt. Exact-cycle coverage is 0.00 and live_alert=false.
CAUM can show reviewable structural exposure. Real customer savings require the customer's baseline, frequency, workflow economics, and operational decision process.
These JSON files are intentionally boring in the right way: structural fields, public signal, tier, cost, hash-chain evidence, and product boundary.
Loading receipt...
This page is allowed to show attestation because the attestation is structural. It is not a semantic verdict.
Start with a neutral trace or a recurring agent run. If the same structural pattern repeats, move that workflow to CAUM Live.